2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2000 Jaguar F-Type
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar F-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar F-Type would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar F-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar F-Type (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 304 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (86 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar F-Type should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 1062 kg more than 2000 Jaguar F-Type.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Jaguar F-Type has automatic transmission and 2006 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2006 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Jaguar F-Type will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 2000 Jaguar F-Type | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | Ranger | F-Type |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 4194 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 2862 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4100 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2390 mm |
