2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2000 Nissan Cefiro
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Nissan Cefiro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Nissan Cefiro would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 1426 kg more than 2000 Nissan Cefiro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Nissan Cefiro has automatic transmission and 2006 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2006 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Nissan Cefiro will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 2000 Nissan Cefiro | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Ranger | Cefiro |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2184 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2856 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1500 mm |