2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2002 Toyota FCHV 5
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Toyota FCHV 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2002 Toyota FCHV 5. (190 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2002 Toyota FCHV 5.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Toyota FCHV 5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 (353 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (324 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger. 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 has automatic transmission and 2006 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2006 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Ranger | FCHV 5 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 2981 cc |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 353 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 2720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 60 L |