2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2007 Mazda 6

To start off, 2007 Mazda 6 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda 6 (156 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger.

Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 209 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Ford Ranger 2007 Mazda 6
Make Ford Mazda
Model Ranger 6
Year Released 2006 2007
Body Type Pickup Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2299 cc 2258 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 143 HP 156 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 209 Nm 209 Nm
Torque RPM 3750 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87.4 mm 87.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 94 mm 94 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.7:1 11.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4820 mm 4750 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1770 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2840 mm 2680 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 59 L 68 L