2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2009 Kia Optima

To start off, 2009 Kia Optima is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2009 Kia Optima. (173 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2009 Kia Optima.

Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Kia Optima. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Kia Optima. (169 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Kia Optima.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Ford Ranger 2009 Kia Optima
Make Ford Kia
Model Ranger Optima
Year Released 2006 2009
Body Type Pickup Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4016 cc 2399 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 206 HP 173 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 324 Nm 169 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 100.4 mm 91 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84.4 mm 96 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 5150 mm 4810 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1780 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 3010 mm 2730 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 84 L 62 L