2006 Isuzu I-350 vs. 1984 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 3,458 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1984 Volkswagen Polo. (53 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 should accelerate faster than 1984 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 2006 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Volkswagen Polo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (305 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Volkswagen Polo. (97 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu I-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Isuzu I-350 | 1984 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Isuzu | Volkswagen |
| Model | I-350 | Polo |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1984 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3458 cc | 1272 cc |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 97 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 3660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2400 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 40 L |
