2006 Isuzu I-350 vs. 2010 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2010 Kia Cee'd is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Isuzu I-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Isuzu I-350 would be higher.
Because 2006 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Kia Cee'd. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (305 Nm) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Kia Cee'd. (137 Nm). This means 2006 Isuzu I-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Kia Cee'd. 2006 Isuzu I-350 has automatic transmission and 2010 Kia Cee'd has manual transmission. 2010 Kia Cee'd will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Isuzu I-350 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Isuzu I-350 | 2010 Kia Cee'd | |
Make | Isuzu | Kia |
Model | I-350 | Cee'd |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 137 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1800 mm |