2006 Land Rover LR3 vs. 1973 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2006 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (216 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1973 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda RX-2.
Because 2006 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (365 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Land Rover LR3 | 1973 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Land Rover | Mazda |
Model | LR3 | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 365 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2480 mm |