2006 Land Rover LR3 vs. 1995 Mini MK VI
To start off, 2006 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mini MK VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mini MK VI would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (216 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1995 Mini MK VI. (41 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1995 Mini MK VI.
Because 2006 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Mini MK VI. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (365 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 297 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mini MK VI. (68 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2006 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mini MK VI.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Land Rover LR3 | 1995 Mini MK VI | |
Make | Land Rover | Mini |
Model | LR3 | MK VI |
Year Released | 2006 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 41 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 365 Nm | 68 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2040 mm |