2006 Lincoln Mark LT vs. 1963 Morgan 4
To start off, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 5,406 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT (300 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 245 more horse power than 1963 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT should accelerate faster than 1963 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT weights approximately 1776 kg more than 1963 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Morgan 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Lincoln Mark LT | 1963 Morgan 4 | |
| Make | Lincoln | Morgan |
| Model | Mark LT | 4 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5406 cc | 1340 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 55 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2436 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3520 mm | 2450 mm |
