2006 Mazda 3 vs. 1992 Plymouth Colt
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (139 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1992 Plymouth Colt. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1992 Plymouth Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Plymouth Colt weights approximately 415 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 3 (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Plymouth Colt. (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Plymouth Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda 3 | 1992 Plymouth Colt | |
| Make | Mazda | Plymouth |
| Model | 3 | Colt |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1834 cc |
| Horse Power | 139 HP | 111 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 182 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1225 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2530 mm |
