2006 Mazda 3 vs. 2011 Chevrolet Lacetti
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Lacetti is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (150 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2011 Chevrolet Lacetti. (94 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2011 Chevrolet Lacetti.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 3 (183 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Chevrolet Lacetti. (131 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Chevrolet Lacetti.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 3 | 2011 Chevrolet Lacetti | |
Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
Model | 3 | Lacetti |
Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1399 cc |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 131 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.6 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 60 L |