2006 Mazda 3 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Matiz
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Matiz is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (139 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Matiz. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Matiz weights approximately 120 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 3 (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Matiz. (91 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 3 | 2012 Chevrolet Matiz | |
Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
Model | 3 | Matiz |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 995 cc |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 182 Nm | 91 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 35 L |