2006 Mazda 5 vs. 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2006 Mazda 5 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,246 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 5 | 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Mazda | Studebaker |
Model | 5 | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 2006 | 1959 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 4246 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 157 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2980 mm |