2006 Mazda Drifter vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda Drifter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda Drifter would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC60 (296 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 2006 Mazda Drifter. (123 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda Drifter.
Because 2013 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda Drifter. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo XC60 (441 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda Drifter. (206 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda Drifter.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda Drifter | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | Drifter | XC60 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2606 cc | 3000 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 6 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 296 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 206 Nm | 441 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4627 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1713 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2774 mm |
