2006 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1981 Toyota Tercel
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Toyota Tercel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Toyota Tercel would be higher. At 1,311 cc, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Toyota Tercel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Mazda RX-8 has automatic transmission and 1981 Toyota Tercel has manual transmission. 1981 Toyota Tercel will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mazda RX-8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda RX-8 | 1981 Toyota Tercel | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | RX-8 | Tercel |
Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1311 cc | 1293 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2510 mm |