2006 MG TF vs. 1985 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2006 MG TF is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,973 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 MG TF (114 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1985 Nissan Cedric. (102 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 MG TF should accelerate faster than 1985 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 105 kg more than 2006 MG TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Nissan Cedric (168 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 MG TF. (145 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 1985 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
2006 MG TF | 1985 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | MG | Nissan |
Model | TF | Cedric |
Year Released | 2006 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1973 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 168 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1275 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2740 mm |