2006 Toyota Highlander vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2006 Toyota Highlander is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Highlander (215 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 185 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Highlander (302 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Highlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Toyota Highlander | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Toyota | Triumph |
| Model | Highlander | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3310 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 302 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1355 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 64 L |
