2007 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1947 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,481 cc (6 cylinders), 1947 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1947 Talbot T 26. (168 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1947 Talbot T 26.
Because 1947 Talbot T 26 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 Talbot T 26. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2007 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1947 Talbot T 26 has manual transmission. 1947 Talbot T 26 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda CX-9 | 1947 Talbot T 26 | |
Make | Mazda | Talbot |
Model | CX-9 | T 26 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1947 |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 4481 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3130 mm |