2007 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1995 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,705 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1995 Ford Falcon. (228 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1995 Ford Falcon.
Because 2007 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Falcon (398 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mazda CX-9. (338 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mazda CX-9.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Mazda CX-9 | 1995 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | CX-9 | Falcon |
Year Released | 2007 | 1995 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 3705 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 398 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2800 mm |