2007 Renault Clio vs. 1959 Rover P5
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Rover P5 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Rover P5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Renault Clio (197 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1959 Rover P5. (106 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1959 Rover P5.
Because 1959 Rover P5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Rover P5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Renault Clio (292 Nm @ 5550 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Rover P5. (222 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2007 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Rover P5.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Renault Clio | 1959 Rover P5 | |
| Make | Renault | Rover |
| Model | Clio | P5 |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2995 cc |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 292 Nm | 222 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5550 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.7 mm | 77.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 105 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
