2008 Audi TT vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Audi TT would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHARGER weights approximately 409 kg more than 2008 Audi TT.
Because 2008 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Dodge CHARGER. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (536 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Audi TT. (320 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2013 Dodge CHARGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi TT | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
Make | Audi | Dodge |
Model | TT | CHARGER |
Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 365 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 536 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.9 mm | 90 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1929 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5077 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1482 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3052 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 72 L |