2008 Chrysler Neon vs. 2012 Mitsubishi ASX
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi ASX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Chrysler Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Chrysler Neon would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mitsubishi ASX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mitsubishi ASX weights approximately 110 kg more than 2008 Chrysler Neon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mitsubishi ASX (196 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chrysler Neon. (157 Nm @ 4550 RPM). This means 2012 Mitsubishi ASX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chrysler Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler Neon | 2012 Mitsubishi ASX | |
Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
Model | Neon | ASX |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 157 Nm | 196 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4550 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 63 L |