2008 Holden Epica vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Holden Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Holden Epica would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (270 HP) has 117 more horse power than 2008 Holden Epica. (153 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2008 Holden Epica.
Because 2010 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2010 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Holden Epica | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Holden | Cadillac |
Model | Epica | CTS |
Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2492 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 270 HP |
Torque | 237 Nm | 302 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4805 mm | 4867 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1504 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2880 mm |