2008 Honda CR-V vs. 2012 BMW 760
To start off, 2012 BMW 760 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Honda CR-V would be higher. At 5,972 cc (12 cylinders), 2012 BMW 760 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 BMW 760 weights approximately 688 kg more than 2008 Honda CR-V.
Because 2008 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 BMW 760. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW 760 (750 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 560 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Honda CR-V. (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 BMW 760 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Honda CR-V | 2012 BMW 760 | |
Make | Honda | BMW |
Model | CR-V | 760 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 5972 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 541 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 750 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 165 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 13.8 seconds | 4.6 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1562 kg | 2250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5212 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1479 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.7 L/100km | 13 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 82 L |