2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2003 Audi TT
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi TT would be higher. At 2,987 cc, 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1100 kg more than 2003 Audi TT.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Audi TT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 275 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Audi TT. (235 Nm @ 1950 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Commander | 2003 Audi TT | |
Make | Jeep | Audi |
Model | Commander | TT |
Year Released | 2008 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 1781 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 235 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 1950 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 81.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 86.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2410 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2270 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2430 mm |