2008 Jeep Commander vs. 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser

To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 510 kg more than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser. (380 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Jeep Commander 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser
Make Jeep Toyota
Model Commander Land Cruiser
Year Released 2008 2003
Body Type SUV SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2987 cc 3993 cc
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 0 HP 246 HP
Torque 510 Nm 380 Nm
Torque RPM 1600 RPM 3800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83 mm 94 mm
Engine Stroke Size 92 mm 95 mm
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 2410 kg 1900 kg
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 4820 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 2270 mm 1880 mm
Wheelbase Size 2790 mm 2800 mm