2008 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2003 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Nissan Pathfinder. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Nissan Pathfinder would be higher. At 3,628 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 767 kg more than 2003 Nissan Pathfinder.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover (640 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Nissan Pathfinder. (360 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Nissan Pathfinder.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Land Rover Range Rover | 2003 Nissan Pathfinder | |
Make | Land Rover | Nissan |
Model | Range Rover | Pathfinder |
Year Released | 2008 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3628 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 238 HP |
Torque | 640 Nm | 360 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 95.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 81.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2717 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 105 L | 80 L |