2008 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1981 Volvo 260
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 3,725 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (270 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1981 Volvo 260. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1981 Volvo 260. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Volvo 260 weights approximately 41 kg more than 2008 Mazda CX-9.
Because 2008 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Volvo 260. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (370 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Volvo 260. (231 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Volvo 260.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda CX-9 | 1981 Volvo 260 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | CX-9 | 260 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3725 cc | 2849 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 270 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 370 Nm | 231 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1329 kg | 1370 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2660 mm |
