2008 Mazda Rustler vs. 2010 Nissan Navara
To start off, 2010 Nissan Navara is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mazda Rustler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mazda Rustler would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Navara is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Navara weights approximately 1082 kg more than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Because 2010 Nissan Navara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mazda Rustler. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Navara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Navara (403 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 301 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (102 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan Navara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda Rustler | 2010 Nissan Navara | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | Rustler | Navara |
Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 2488 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 172 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 403 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 100 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 2032 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 80 L |