2008 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2004 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2008 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Pathfinder. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Pathfinder would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder (231 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2008 Mazda RX-8. (189 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda RX-8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 386 kg more than 2008 Mazda RX-8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder (363 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda RX-8. (220 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda RX-8 | 2004 Nissan Pathfinder | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | RX-8 | Pathfinder |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1308 cc | 3507 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 231 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 363 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1422 kg | 1808 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.6 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 80 L |