2009 Cadillac CTS vs. 1976 Fiat 128

To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Fiat 128. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Fiat 128 would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (304 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 251 more horse power than 1976 Fiat 128. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1976 Fiat 128. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 914 kg more than 1976 Fiat 128. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Fiat 128, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1976 Fiat 128 has manual transmission. 1976 Fiat 128 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: