2009 Cadillac SRX vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2009 Cadillac SRX is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac SRX (254 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 4 kg more than 2009 Cadillac SRX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Cadillac SRX | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
| Model | SRX | 62 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3564 cc | 7028 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 254 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2071 kg | 2075 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 79 L |
