2009 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1986 Rover 825i

To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Rover 825i. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Rover 825i would be higher. At 3,349 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox (182 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1986 Rover 825i. (170 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1986 Rover 825i. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 785 kg more than 1986 Rover 825i. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Rover 825i (217 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Equinox. (210 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1986 Rover 825i will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Equinox. 2009 Chevrolet Equinox has automatic transmission and 1986 Rover 825i has manual transmission. 1986 Rover 825i will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Chevrolet Equinox will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Chevrolet Equinox 1986 Rover 825i
Make Chevrolet Rover
Model Equinox 825i
Year Released 2009 1986
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3349 cc 2493 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 182 HP 170 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 210 Nm 217 Nm
Torque RPM 3800 RPM 5000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 92 mm 84 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 75 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 9.6:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 2141 kg 1356 kg
Vehicle Length 4800 mm 4700 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1740 mm
Vehicle Height 1710 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2860 mm 2760 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]