2009 Ford E-350 vs. 1976 Seat 133
To start off, 2009 Ford E-350 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Seat 133. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Seat 133 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 221 more horse power than 1976 Seat 133. (34 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1976 Seat 133. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford E-350 weights approximately 276 kg more than 1976 Seat 133. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford E-350 (475 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 421 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Seat 133. (54 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Seat 133.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford E-350 | 1976 Seat 133 | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | E-350 | 133 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 843 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 54 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 690 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 3460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2030 mm |