2009 Ford Ka vs. 2012 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2012 Jeep Compass is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Ford Ka would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jeep Compass (158 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ka. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jeep Compass (191 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Ka | 2012 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Ka | Compass |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 106 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4448 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1814 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1651 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 51 L |