2009 Jeep Patriot vs. 1981 Lincoln Mark VI
To start off, 2009 Jeep Patriot is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Lincoln Mark VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Lincoln Mark VI would be higher. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Patriot (148 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1981 Lincoln Mark VI. (139 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Patriot should accelerate faster than 1981 Lincoln Mark VI.
Because 1981 Lincoln Mark VI is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Lincoln Mark VI. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Patriot, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Jeep Patriot | 1981 Lincoln Mark VI | |
| Make | Jeep | Lincoln |
| Model | Patriot | Mark VI |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | electric | V |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 139 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
