2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs. 2003 Mazda Premacy
To start off, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda Premacy. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda Premacy would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport weights approximately 670 kg more than 2003 Mazda Premacy.
Because 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mazda Premacy. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | 2003 Mazda Premacy | |
Make | Land Rover | Mazda |
Model | Range Rover Sport | Premacy |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 134 HP |
Top Speed | 194 km/hour | 183 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 22.2 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 58 L |