2009 Lincoln MKS vs. 1966 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2009 Lincoln MKS is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 3,724 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Lincoln MKS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lincoln MKS (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 220 more horse power than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lincoln MKS should accelerate faster than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Because 2009 Lincoln MKS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Riley Kestrel. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Lincoln MKS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Lincoln MKS (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 283 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Lincoln MKS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Lincoln MKS | 1966 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Lincoln | Riley |
Model | MKS | Kestrel |
Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 3724 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 366 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 25 L |