2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1966 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 2,488 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (169 HP) has 80 more horse power than 1966 Triumph Vitesse. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph Vitesse.
Because 1966 Triumph Vitesse is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Triumph Vitesse. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 1966 Triumph Vitesse has manual transmission. 1966 Triumph Vitesse will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda 6 | 1966 Triumph Vitesse | |
| Make | Mazda | Triumph |
| Model | 6 | Vitesse |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2488 cc | 1998 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 169 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 76 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 38 L |
