2009 Mazda 6 vs. 1997 Peugeot 106
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Peugeot 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Peugeot 106 would be higher. At 2,487 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1997 Peugeot 106. (44 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1997 Peugeot 106.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (167 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Peugeot 106. (70 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Peugeot 106.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 1997 Peugeot 106 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | 6 | 106 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2487 cc | 954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 70 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1580 mm |