2009 Mazda 6 vs. 2010 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2010 Kia Cee'd is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 2,488 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (169 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2010 Kia Cee'd. (124 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2010 Kia Cee'd. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 150 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Kia Cee'd. (154 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Kia Cee'd.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda 6 | 2010 Kia Cee'd | |
Make | Mazda | Kia |
Model | 6 | Cee'd |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2488 cc | 1590 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 169 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 154 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 85.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 10.5:1 |
Top Speed | 208 km/hour | 192 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.5 seconds | 10.8 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1275 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 53 L |