2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK

To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK (367 HP) has 99 more horse power than 2009 Mazda CX-9. (268 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda CX-9.

Because 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK has manual transmission. 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Mazda CX-9 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK
Make Mazda Mercedes-Benz
Model CX-9 CLK
Year Released 2009 2000
Body Type SUV Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3727 cc 5500 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 268 HP 367 HP
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4600 mm 4580 mm
Vehicle Width 1940 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1730 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2340 mm 2780 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 76 L 88 L