2009 Suzuki Equator vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2009 Suzuki Equator is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,954 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Suzuki Equator (262 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 105 kg more than 2009 Suzuki Equator.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Suzuki Equator (381 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Suzuki Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Suzuki Equator | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Suzuki | Triumph |
Model | Equator | 2000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3954 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 262 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 381 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5600 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3560 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 64 L |