2010 Audi TT vs. 1999 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 3,801 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Mustang (187 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2010 Audi TT. (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2010 Audi TT.
Because 2010 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi TT (350 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford Mustang. (298 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2010 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Audi TT | 1999 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | TT | Mustang |
Year Released | 2010 | 1999 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 3801 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 298 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | AWD | Rear |
Transmission Type | 6-speed automated manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4201 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1842 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1359 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2469 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 45 L |