2010 Holden Commodore vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 63 more horse power than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. (177 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2003 Nissan X-Trail.
Because 2003 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (245 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2003 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Holden Commodore | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | Commodore | X-Trail |
Year Released | 2010 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2564 cc | 2487 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 177 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 245 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |