2010 Mazda 3 vs. 2008 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Holden Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Holden Epica would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (167 HP) has 14 more horse power than 2008 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2008 Holden Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda 3. (228 Nm). This means 2008 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda 3. 2008 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 2010 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2010 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Mazda 3 | 2008 Holden Epica | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | 3 | Epica |
Year Released | 2010 | 2008 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 167 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 228 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4506 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1755 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1471 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2639 mm | 2700 mm |