2010 Suzuki Swift vs. 2012 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2012 Dodge Challenger is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Suzuki Swift. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Suzuki Swift would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Suzuki Swift is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Swift will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Dodge Challenger has automatic transmission and 2010 Suzuki Swift has manual transmission. 2010 Suzuki Swift will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Dodge Challenger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Suzuki Swift | 2012 Dodge Challenger | |
| Make | Suzuki | Dodge |
| Model | Swift | Challenger |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1400 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 305 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 5022 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1695 mm | 1923 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2946 mm |
