2010 Volvo C30 vs. 2013 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2013 Jeep Compass is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Volvo C30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Volvo C30 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Compass (170 HP) has 56 more horse power than 2010 Volvo C30. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 2010 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 2 kg more than 2013 Jeep Compass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C30 (270 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Jeep Compass. (224 Nm). This means 2010 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Volvo C30 | 2013 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Volvo | Jeep |
Model | C30 | Compass |
Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1600 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 170 HP |
Torque | 270 Nm | 224 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | 6-speed manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1451 kg | 1449 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4252 mm | 4448 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1783 mm | 1811 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1448 mm | 1651 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2639 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 51 L |