2011 Fisker Karma vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Fisker Karma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Fisker Karma would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Fisker Karma weights approximately 729 kg more than 2013 Chevrolet Equinox.
Because 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Fisker Karma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Fisker Karma | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
| Make | Fisker | Chevrolet |
| Model | Karma | Equinox |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 180 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Single Speed | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2540 kg | 1811 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4996 mm | 4771 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1984 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1331 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2857 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 71 L |
